From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bemis v. Morey

Supreme Court of New Hampshire Carroll
Jun 1, 1883
62 N.H. 511 (N.H. 1883)

Opinion

Decided June, 1883.

All, or a part only, of the issues in a case are tried at one time, according to the requirements of justice and convenience.

PETITION, for leave to appeal from a probate decree allowing a will.

W. L. Foster, for the plaintiffs.

Bingham, Aldrich Remich, for the defendant.


The issues are, whether the testator was sane, whether the will was obtained by undue influence, whether the plaintiffs were prevented from appealing within sixty days through mistake, accident, or misfortune, and whether they have an interest that may be concluded by the probate of the will. Whether the issue on the plaintiffs' interest should be tried first, or whether all the issues should be tried together, is a question of justice and convenience, which is generally a question of fact, determinable at the trial term. This appeal is taken to the law term. As a matter of fact, justice and convenience require that the issue on the plaintiffs' interest should be tried and decided before the trial of the other issues, and such will be the order of procedure.

All concurred.

The issue on the plaintiffs' interest was subsequently tried, and determined adversely to them, and their petition for leave to appeal was denied.


Summaries of

Bemis v. Morey

Supreme Court of New Hampshire Carroll
Jun 1, 1883
62 N.H. 511 (N.H. 1883)
Case details for

Bemis v. Morey

Case Details

Full title:BEMIS a. v. MOREY, Ex'r

Court:Supreme Court of New Hampshire Carroll

Date published: Jun 1, 1883

Citations

62 N.H. 511 (N.H. 1883)

Citing Cases

Hutt v. Hickey

Rutherford v. Whitcher, 60 N.H. 110; Metcalf v. Gilmore, 59 N.H. 417. More than one method of procedure may…

Holman v. Manning

Metcalf v. Gilmore, 59 N.H. 417; Walker v. Walker, 63 N.H. 321, 326; Brooks v. Howison, 63 N.H. 382; Owen v.…