From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bement v. Dean

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Nov 1, 1935
246 App. Div. 670 (N.Y. App. Div. 1935)

Opinion

November, 1935.

Appeal, by the grantor and grantee in a deed, from a judgment recovered in an action brought by the judgment creditors, setting aside the transfer of a farm by a husband to his wife without consideration. The deed was set aside upon the ground that the transfer was made to hinder, delay and defraud present and future creditors. The deed was executed and acknowledged on February 24, 1928, but not recorded until January 6, 1932. The judgment recovered by one of the plaintiffs was upon a note originally given in 1927; the other on an obligation that arose in 1930. After the transfer there was no visible change in occupation. The property was still assessed to the husband, and the insurance upon the buildings was carried in his name. Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs.

Present — Hill, P.J., Rhodes, Crapser, Bliss and Heffernan, JJ.


Summaries of

Bement v. Dean

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Nov 1, 1935
246 App. Div. 670 (N.Y. App. Div. 1935)
Case details for

Bement v. Dean

Case Details

Full title:GRANT BEMENT and Another, Copartners Engaged in Business under the Firm…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Nov 1, 1935

Citations

246 App. Div. 670 (N.Y. App. Div. 1935)

Citing Cases

Matter of Russo

See also Sabatino v. Cannizzaro, 243 App. Div. 20, 275 N.Y.S. 677 (1st Dept. 1934) In the case of Bement v.…

Marine Midland v. Murkoff

While it may not be terribly significant that Norman and not Abby dealt with the tenants of the house which…