From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Belyus v. Wilkinson, Gaddis Co.

Court of Errors and Appeals
Jan 31, 1936
116 N.J.L. 92 (N.J. 1936)

Opinion

Argued October 17, 1935 —

Decided January 31, 1936.

On appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported in 115 N.J.L. 43.

For the appellant, Merritt Lane.

For the respondent, Charles Becker and Samuel J. Kaufman.


Respondent's husband, Michael Belyus, was employed by Wilkinson, Gaddis Company as a handy man about their stables and garage. On August 4th, 1925, he suffered burns from which he died two days later. It is conceded that he met with an accident on his employer's premises during his working hours. Appellant contends that the accident did not arise out of and in the course of his employment. Compensation was awarded by the workmen's compensation bureau, which was reversed by the Essex Common Pleas Court, which judgment was reversed by the Supreme Court.

The testimony is necessarily meagre as no one saw the accident, but it discloses that the deceased had previously used gasoline and kerosene in his work, and this was the fluid in the bucket when the fire occurred. There was no physical evidence that deceased was engaged in anything not pertaining to his duties to his employer.

Under the testimony and reasonable presumptions arising therefrom, we conclude that the judgment of the Supreme Court should be affirmed.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, CHIEF JUSTICE, BODINE, DONGES, DEAR, WOLFSKEIL, RAFFERTY, JJ. 7.

For reversal — LLOYD, CASE, HETFIELD, WELLS, JJ. 4.


Summaries of

Belyus v. Wilkinson, Gaddis Co.

Court of Errors and Appeals
Jan 31, 1936
116 N.J.L. 92 (N.J. 1936)
Case details for

Belyus v. Wilkinson, Gaddis Co.

Case Details

Full title:ANNA BELYUS, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT, v. WILKINSON, GADDIS COMPANY…

Court:Court of Errors and Appeals

Date published: Jan 31, 1936

Citations

116 N.J.L. 92 (N.J. 1936)
182 A. 873

Citing Cases

White v. Atlantic City Press

The fountainhead of the inquiry here lies in the question whether the hazard giving rise to petitioner's…

Tocci v. Tessler Weiss, Inc.

On October 10, 1956 the plaintiff was at the plant premises during the luncheon hour and was preparing to…