From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Belmont Homes, Inc. v. Kreutzer

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 12, 1958
6 A.D.2d 697 (N.Y. App. Div. 1958)

Opinion

May 12, 1958

Present — Nolan, P.J., Beldock, Murphy, Ughetta and Kleinfeld, JJ.


In an action for (1) a judgment declaring unauthorized a resolution with respect to the construction of water facilities in a new development and the charges established by the resolution unenforcible, (2) an injunction against the enforcement of the resolution, and (3) for an accounting of money deposited, a judgment was entered after trial granting a limited accounting but dismissing the complaint in all other respects. The appeal is from so much of the judgment as dismissed the complaint "in all other respects". Judgment insofar as appealed from unanimously affirmed, with costs. In our opinion plaintiff was not coerced in entering into the agreement but did so voluntarily and, having benefited therefrom, is estopped from questioning its validity. ( Mayor, Aldermen and Commonalty of City of New York v. Sonneborn, 113 N.Y. 423; City of Buffalo v. Balcom, 134 N.Y. 532; City of New York v. Delli Paoli, 202 N.Y. 18.)


Summaries of

Belmont Homes, Inc. v. Kreutzer

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 12, 1958
6 A.D.2d 697 (N.Y. App. Div. 1958)
Case details for

Belmont Homes, Inc. v. Kreutzer

Case Details

Full title:BELMONT HOMES, INC., Appellant, v. HOWARD P. KREUTZER et al., Individually…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 12, 1958

Citations

6 A.D.2d 697 (N.Y. App. Div. 1958)

Citing Cases

Matter of City of New York

The school site was selected by the site selection board by resolution on June 21, 1971, and the maps of the…

Lordi v. County of Nassau

The Board of Supervisors could have acted by resolution to grant the license (cf. Hayes v. City of Yonkers, 7…