Bellsouth Advertising v. Donnelly Inf. Pub

Full title: BELLSOUTH ADVERTISING PUBLISHING CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF-COUNTERCLAIM…

Court: United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit

Date published: Nov 4, 1992

977 F.2d 1435 (11th Cir. 1992)

Opinion

No. 89-5131.

November 4, 1992.

Douglas C. Broeker, Michael J. Cappucio, Fowler, White, Burnett, Hurley, Banick Strickroot, Miami, Fla., David L. Foster, Theodore Case Whitehouse, Francis J. Menton, Jr., Willkie, Farr Gallager, Baila H. Celedonia, Roger L. Zissu, Cowan, Liebowitz Latman, P.C., New York City, for appellants.

Robert E. Richards, Anthony B. Askew, Jones, Askew Lunsford, Atlanta, Ga., for Bellsouth Advertising.

John K. Roedel, Jr., Senniger, Powers, Leavitt Roedel, St. Louis, Mo., for amicus ANADP.

Robert E. Marsh, Blackwell, Sanders, Matheny, Weary Lombardi, Kansas City, Mo., for amicus US West.

Robert Alan Garrett, Arnold Porter, Washington, D.C., for amicus Bell Atlantic.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida; Thomas E. Scott, Judge.

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC (Opinion June 18, 1991, 11th Cir., 1991, 933 F.2d 952)

Before TJOFLAT, Chief Judge, FAY, HATCHETT, EDMONDSON, BIRCH, BLACK and CARNES, Circuit Judges.^_

_ Judges Phyllis A. Kravitch, R. Lanier Anderson, III, Emmett R. Cox and Joel F. Dubina have recused themselves and will not participate.

BY THE COURT:

A member of this court in active service having requested a poll on the application for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in this court in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that the above cause shall be reheard by this court en banc. The previous panel's opinion is hereby VACATED.