From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bellamy v. N.Y.C. Police Dep't

Court of Appeals of New York.
Feb 12, 2013
2013 N.Y. Slip Op. 886 (N.Y. 2013)

Opinion

2013-02-12

In the Matter of Perry BELLAMY, Appellant, v. NEW YORK CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT, Respondent.

Perry Bellamy, appellant pro se. Michael A. Cardozo, Corporation Counsel, New York City (Sharyn Rootenberg and Larry A. Sonnenshein of counsel), for respondent.


Perry Bellamy, appellant pro se. Michael A. Cardozo, Corporation Counsel, New York City (Sharyn Rootenberg and Larry A. Sonnenshein of counsel), for respondent.

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order affirmed, without costs, and certified question not answered on the ground that it is unnecessary. In denying the subject Freedom of Information Law request, the Appellate Division did not abuse its discretion.

Chief Judge LIPPMAN and Judges GRAFFEO, READ, SMITH and PIGOTT concur. Judge RIVERA took no part.


Summaries of

Bellamy v. N.Y.C. Police Dep't

Court of Appeals of New York.
Feb 12, 2013
2013 N.Y. Slip Op. 886 (N.Y. 2013)
Case details for

Bellamy v. N.Y.C. Police Dep't

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Perry BELLAMY, Appellant, v. NEW YORK CITY POLICE…

Court:Court of Appeals of New York.

Date published: Feb 12, 2013

Citations

2013 N.Y. Slip Op. 886 (N.Y. 2013)
2013 N.Y. Slip Op. 886
960 N.Y.S.2d 343
984 N.E.2d 317

Citing Cases

Empire Ctr. for Pub. Policy v. N.Y.C. Police Pension Fund

POL § 87(2)(f) exempts materials that, if disclosed, could endanger the life or safety of any person. An…

Empire Ctr. for Pub. Policy v. Office of Payroll Admin. N.Y.

"Public Officers Law § 87 (2) (f) permits an agency to deny access to records, that, if disclosed, would…