noting that § 1111(b)'s purpose is to allow the undersecured creditor to vote with other unsecured creditors and that separately classifying such claims would "effectively nullify the option that Congress provided to undersecured creditors to vote their deficiency as unsecured debt."
Summary of this case from In re JRV Industries, Inc.No. 94-527.
January 17, 1995.
C.A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 24 F. 3d 1251.
noting that § 1111(b)'s purpose is to allow the undersecured creditor to vote with other unsecured creditors and that separately classifying such claims would "effectively nullify the option that Congress provided to undersecured creditors to vote their deficiency as unsecured debt."
Summary of this case from In re JRV Industries, Inc.Full title:BELLA v. CHAMBERLAIN ET AL
Court:U.S.
Date published: Jan 17, 1995
See Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Loop 76 LLC (In re Loop 76, LLC) 465 B.R. 525 (9th Cir. BAP 2012). NYCB argues…
Prince William County v. Omni HomesThese criteria did not provide a bright line test but required courts to engage in a case-by-case, ad hoc…