From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bell v. New York Higher Education Assistance Corp.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 18, 1990
564 N.E.2d 664 (N.Y. 1990)

Opinion

Submitted August 27, 1990

Decided October 18, 1990


Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution.

Cross motion for imposition of sanctions granted (see, 22 NYCRR part 130). This is the fifth motion in a chain reflecting a strategy of dilatory, frivolous avoidance of a 20-year-old student loan debt for two years' law school education. The abuse of the judicial process and the imposition on opposition parties, aggravated by movant's failure to pay usual motion costs imposed by this Court on previous applications to this Court, amply justify the imposition of sanctions in the sum of $1,000 pursuant to 22 N.Y.CRR part 130.


Summaries of

Bell v. New York Higher Education Assistance Corp.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 18, 1990
564 N.E.2d 664 (N.Y. 1990)
Case details for

Bell v. New York Higher Education Assistance Corp.

Case Details

Full title:JOHN B. BELL, Appellant, v. NEW YORK HIGHER EDUCATION ASSISTANCE…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Oct 18, 1990

Citations

564 N.E.2d 664 (N.Y. 1990)
563 N.Y.S.2d 54
76 N.Y.2d 930

Citing Cases

Matter of Jemzura v. Mugglin

In our view, the present proceeding is simply another in petitioners' "barrage of litigation" over the years…

Levy v. Carol Management Corporation

Although, as noted, we are not imposing sanctions in response to matters not presently before us, the…