From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bell v. Florida

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TALLAHASSEE DIVISION
Jul 28, 2016
4:16cv278-WS/CAS (N.D. Fla. Jul. 28, 2016)

Opinion

4:16cv278-WS/CAS

07-28-2016

MAURICE BELL, Plaintiff, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Defendant.


ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Before the court is the magistrate judge's report and recommendation (doc. 7) docketed June 23, 2016. The magistrate judge recommends that the plaintiff's case be dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. The plaintiff has filed objections (doc. 9) to the report and recommendation.

The court has reviewed the record in light of the plaintiff's objections and has determined that the magistrate judge's report and recommendation should be adopted. Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

1. The magistrate judge's report and recommendation (doc. 7) is hereby ADOPTED and incorporated by reference in this order.

2. The plaintiff's complaint and this action are DISMISSED for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.

3. The clerk shall enter judgment stating: "All claims are dismissed."

DONE AND ORDERED this 28th day of July, 2016.

s/ William Stafford

WILLIAM STAFFORD

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Bell v. Florida

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TALLAHASSEE DIVISION
Jul 28, 2016
4:16cv278-WS/CAS (N.D. Fla. Jul. 28, 2016)
Case details for

Bell v. Florida

Case Details

Full title:MAURICE BELL, Plaintiff, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

Date published: Jul 28, 2016

Citations

4:16cv278-WS/CAS (N.D. Fla. Jul. 28, 2016)

Citing Cases

Marts v. Inch

"The right of access to the courts is neither absolute nor unconditional, and there is no constitutional…