From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bell v. Comm'r of Corr.

Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Nov 28, 2018
330 Conn. 949 (Conn. 2018)

Summary

reversing convictions under similar facts

Summary of this case from Coltherst v. Commissioner of Correction

Opinion

11-28-2018

Leon BELL v. COMMISSIONER OF CORRECTION

Sarah Hanna, assistant state's attorney, in support of the petition. David B. Rozwaski, assigned counsel, in opposition.


The respondent's petition for certification to appeal from the Appellate Court, 184 Conn.App. 150, 194 A.3d 809 (2018), is granted, limited to the following issue:

"Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the absence of an instruction in accordance with State v. Salamon, 287 Conn. 509, 949 A.2d 1092 (2008), at the petitioner's criminal trial was not harmless error?"

McDONALD and MULLINS, Js., would deny the petition.


Summaries of

Bell v. Comm'r of Corr.

Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Nov 28, 2018
330 Conn. 949 (Conn. 2018)

reversing convictions under similar facts

Summary of this case from Coltherst v. Commissioner of Correction
Case details for

Bell v. Comm'r of Corr.

Case Details

Full title:Leon BELL v. COMMISSIONER OF CORRECTION

Court:Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Date published: Nov 28, 2018

Citations

330 Conn. 949 (Conn. 2018)
197 A.3d 390

Citing Cases

Coltherst v. Commissioner of Correction

Id., 124-29. See also Bell v. Commissioner of Correction, 184 Conn.App. 150, 194 A.3d 809, cert. granted, 330…

Bell v. Comm'r of Corr.

We granted the respondent's petition for certification, limited to the following issue: "Did the Appellate…