From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bell v. Commonwealth of Virginia

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
May 28, 1957
245 F.2d 170 (4th Cir. 1957)

Opinion

No. 7421.

Argued May 27, 1957.

Decided May 28, 1957.

William R. Bell, pro se, on brief.

Henry St. J. FitzGerald, Asst. U.S. Atty., Arlington, Va., amicus curiae.

Before PARKER, Chief Judge, and SOPER and HAYNSWORTH, Circuit Judges.


This is an appeal from an order denying a petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Appellant was apprehended in Virginia on a warrant charging him with being a fugitive from justice. This warrant was subsequently dismissed for lack of prosecution; but appellant was taken into custody and transported into the state of Maryland as a violator of parole. While in custody in Virginia, he filed with the court below an application for a writ of habeas corpus, but before the application came on for consideration he had been transported into Maryland. The District Judge properly denied the application because state remedies had not been exhausted as required by 28 U.S.C. § 2254. We have no jurisdiction to entertain the appeal for failure of appellant to obtain the certificate of probable cause required by 28 U.S.C. § 2253; and, as state remedies had not been exhausted at the time of application for the writ, no such certificate would be proper.

Appeal dismissed.


Summaries of

Bell v. Commonwealth of Virginia

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
May 28, 1957
245 F.2d 170 (4th Cir. 1957)
Case details for

Bell v. Commonwealth of Virginia

Case Details

Full title:William R. BELL, Appellant, v. COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, Appellee

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: May 28, 1957

Citations

245 F.2d 170 (4th Cir. 1957)

Citing Cases

McCoy v. Tucker

In the absence of such a certificate by the District Judge, or a Judge of this Court, the Court of Appeals is…

Plater v. Warden, Maryland House of Correction

The relation between the asserted statutory deficiency and the failure of this defendant to perfect a direct…