stating that "expert opinion testimony regarding the general effects * * * of intoxication is ordinarily inadmissible because most jurors have some experience with these conditions"
Summary of this case from State v. GreenleafNo. 92-1136.
February 22, 1993.
C.A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 963 F. 2d 248.
stating that "expert opinion testimony regarding the general effects * * * of intoxication is ordinarily inadmissible because most jurors have some experience with these conditions"
Summary of this case from State v. GreenleafFull title:BELANGER v. MADERA UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT ET AL
Court:U.S.
Date published: Feb 22, 1993
However, these entities may be immune from suit under the Eleventh Amendment if they function as arms of…
U.S. v. WittigThe Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Rule 60(b) relief, holding that the forfeiture…