From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Behrman v. Bendersky

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 1, 1928
224 App. Div. 759 (N.Y. App. Div. 1928)

Opinion

June, 1928.


Judgment reversed upon the law and the facts, with costs, and judgment directed for plaintiff for the amount of the down payment, with interest from August 6, 1925, with costs, upon the ground that at the time fixed for the execution of the "formal contract" defendant was unable to deliver title free of restrictions, which had not been provided for in the binder, and that defendant's own acts in suggesting and acquiescing in an adjournment did not make time of the essence of the contract as of August 14, 1925. Findings of fact and conclusions of law inconsistent herewith are reversed and new findings and appropriate conclusions will be made. Lazansky, P.J., Kapper, Hagarty, Seeger and Scudder, JJ., concur. Settle order on notice.


Summaries of

Behrman v. Bendersky

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 1, 1928
224 App. Div. 759 (N.Y. App. Div. 1928)
Case details for

Behrman v. Bendersky

Case Details

Full title:MEYER BEHRMAN, Appellant, v. AARON BENDERSKY, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 1, 1928

Citations

224 App. Div. 759 (N.Y. App. Div. 1928)

Citing Cases

Rozen v. 7 Calf Creek, LLC

The plaintiffs did so by showing that there was a recorded exception which was not included as a permitted…