From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Behar v. Surface Transportation Corp. of N.Y

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 13, 1942
265 App. Div. 106 (N.Y. App. Div. 1942)

Opinion

November 13, 1942.

Appeal from Supreme Court, Bronx County, SWIFT, J.

George Trosk and Joseph C. Thomson for appellant.

Addison B. Scoville, George F. Dyche and Alfred T. Davison for respondent.


Upon the trial of this action to recover damages for the death of plaintiff's infant son, alleged to have resulted from the negligence of defendant, plaintiff was entitled, upon a motion made at the close of plaintiff's case to dismiss his complaint, to the benefit of the most favorable inferences deducible from the testimony. So tested, plaintiff's evidence established a prima facie case, though the proof was circumstantial in nature. This prima facie case was not destroyed by the existence of possible inconsistencies in the testimony given by plaintiff's witnesses.

The judgment should be reversed and a new trial ordered, with costs to the appellant to abide the event.

UNTERMYER, DORE, COHN and CALLAHAN, JJ., concur; MARTIN, P.J., dissents and votes to affirm.

Judgment reversed upon question of law and a new trial ordered with costs to the appellant to abide the event.


Summaries of

Behar v. Surface Transportation Corp. of N.Y

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 13, 1942
265 App. Div. 106 (N.Y. App. Div. 1942)
Case details for

Behar v. Surface Transportation Corp. of N.Y

Case Details

Full title:ELI BEHAR, Individually and as Administrator of the Estate of ISIDORE…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Nov 13, 1942

Citations

265 App. Div. 106 (N.Y. App. Div. 1942)
37 N.Y.S.2d 775

Citing Cases

Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. Union Trust Co.

The 1936 amendment (L. 1936, ch. 915) to section 440 of the Civil Practice Act eliminated the requirement…

Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. Union Tr. Co.

Had he lived to make any findings proposed by the plaintiff — which presumably would have been "in accordance…