From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Beer-Meisel Lodge No. 8 v. Herschbein

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 18, 1946
270 App. Div. 847 (N.Y. App. Div. 1946)

Opinion

March 18, 1946.


Order denying the appellant's motion to dismiss the complaint as to him for lack of prosecution, on condition that the plaintiffs notice the case for trial for the December, 1945 Term, reversed on the facts, with $10 costs and disbursements, and the motion granted, with $10 costs. Plaintiffs fail to show any valid reason for their unusual delay in prosecuting the action. Lewis, P.J., Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston and Nolan, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Beer-Meisel Lodge No. 8 v. Herschbein

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 18, 1946
270 App. Div. 847 (N.Y. App. Div. 1946)
Case details for

Beer-Meisel Lodge No. 8 v. Herschbein

Case Details

Full title:BEER-MEISEL LODGE NO. 8 INDEPENDENT ORDER BRITH ABRAHAM et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 18, 1946

Citations

270 App. Div. 847 (N.Y. App. Div. 1946)

Citing Cases

Giovannucci v. Brooklyns&sRichmond Ferry Co., Inc.

Plaintiff failed to explain or excuse the delay of more than four years in bringing the cause on for trial…

Giovannucci v. Brooklyn Richmond Ferry Co., Inc.

Plaintiff failed to explain or excuse the delay of more than four years in bringing the cause on for trial…