From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bedell v. Bailey

Supreme Court of New Hampshire Coos
Dec 1, 1876
58 N.H. 62 (N.H. 1876)

Opinion

Decided December, 1876.

The acts of a judge of probate, in the settlement of an estate in which he is interested as an executor, are void.

APPEAL, from the decision of the commissioner, disallowing a claim of the appellants, as executors of Lombard, against one Hall, of whose estate the appellee is administrator. The appellant, Bedell, was judge of probate for the county of Coos. The appellee pleaded that Bedell appointed the commissioner, approved and accepted the report, allowed the appeal, and issued the order of notice. The appellants demurred.

Ray, Drew Jordon, for the appellants.

W. H. Heywood and Fletcher Fletcher, for the appellee.


No judge of probate shall act as such in the settlement of any estate in which he is interested as an executor. Gen. St., c. 170, s. 11. In such a case he has, and can have, no jurisdiction. The acts of Bedell were absolutely void. Stearns v. Wright, 51 N.H. 610; Moses v. Julian, 45 N.H. 60.

Demurrer overruled.

DOE, C. J., did not sit.


Summaries of

Bedell v. Bailey

Supreme Court of New Hampshire Coos
Dec 1, 1876
58 N.H. 62 (N.H. 1876)
Case details for

Bedell v. Bailey

Case Details

Full title:BEDELL a., Ap'ts v. BAILEY, Ap'ee

Court:Supreme Court of New Hampshire Coos

Date published: Dec 1, 1876

Citations

58 N.H. 62 (N.H. 1876)

Citing Cases

Regents of the University v. Turner

" It has been held that an order extending time in a civil action, made by a judge who is disqualified by…

Opinion of the Justices

" This was evidently announced as a conclusion of law, but without discussion, and was induced by statements…