From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Beckman v. Black

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Feb 22, 1984
316 S.E.2d 784 (Ga. Ct. App. 1984)

Opinion

68044.

DECIDED FEBRUARY 22, 1984. REHEARING DENIED MARCH 9, 1984.

Action on legal fees. Fulton Superior Court. Before Judge Jenrette.

Gail M. Beckman, pro se. Thomas C. Dempsey, Beryl H. Weiner, for appellant.

Adrienne Black, pro se. William P. Smith III, for appellee.


Gail Beckman, on August 4, 1983, pursuant to OCGA § 5-6-34 filed with the trial court a direct appeal to this court from an order by the superior court affirming a fee arbitration award conducted by the State Bar of Georgia, a governmental agency. Wallace v. Wallace, 225 Ga. 102, 113 ( 166 S.E.2d 718). OCGA § 5-6-35 mandates that appeals from decisions of superior courts reviewing decisions of state and local administrative agencies shall be by application for permission to appeal including enumerations of error to be urged on appeal and stating why the appellate court has jurisdiction. Such application must be filed with the clerk of this court within 30 days of the order of the superior court of which complaint is made. In this case, the order of the superior court affirming the fee arbitration award is dated July 15, 1983. To date no proper application for discretionary appeal has been filed with the clerk of this court. Inasmuch as the mandated procedure has not and cannot be followed in a timely fashion, the appeal must be dismissed. Hendley v. Auto Owners Ins. Co., 154 Ga. App. 316 ( 268 S.E.2d 722).

Appeal dismissed. Quillian, P. J., and Carley, J., concur.

DECIDED FEBRUARY 22, 1984 — REHEARING DENIED MARCH 9, 1984 — CERT. APPLIED FOR.


Summaries of

Beckman v. Black

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Feb 22, 1984
316 S.E.2d 784 (Ga. Ct. App. 1984)
Case details for

Beckman v. Black

Case Details

Full title:BECKMAN v. BLACK

Court:Court of Appeals of Georgia

Date published: Feb 22, 1984

Citations

316 S.E.2d 784 (Ga. Ct. App. 1984)
316 S.E.2d 784

Citing Cases

Dean v. State

Appeals that have not been filed in compliance with OCGA § 5-6-35 have been dismissed. See, e.g., Russo v.…

Mcfarland v. Roberts

The court noted that McFarland orally withdrew his motion to dismiss during the hearing, and directed the…