From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Beckett v. Warren

Supreme Court of Ohio
Mar 25, 2009
2009 Ohio 1296 (Ohio 2009)

Opinion

No. 2008-2106.

March 25, 2009.

Summit App. No. 23909, 2008-Ohio-4689.


APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW.

Discretionary cross-appeal accepted on Proposition of Law No. I.

PFEIFER, LUNDBEBG STRATTON, and O'DONNELL, JJ., dissent.

Appellee/cross-appellants' motion to clarify the docket is granted. The court determines that a conflict exists, and the court will answer the question certified. The parties are to brief the issue stated at page 1 of the court of appeals Journal Entry filed October 21, 2008, as follows:

"Whether a plaintiff pursuing a claim for bodily injury damages in a case involving a dog [is] required to elect between pursuing a statutory claim under R.C. 955.28 and a common law claim for negligence."

The conflict case is Rodenberger v. Wadsworth (Nov. 25, 1983), Ottawa App. No. OT-83-18. The Clerk shall issue an order for the transmittal of the record from the Court of Appeals for Summit County, and the parties shall brief this case in accordance with the Rules of Practice of the Supreme Court of Ohio.

PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, and O'DONNELL, JJ., dissent.

Discretionary appeal not accepted.


Summaries of

Beckett v. Warren

Supreme Court of Ohio
Mar 25, 2009
2009 Ohio 1296 (Ohio 2009)
Case details for

Beckett v. Warren

Case Details

Full title:Beckett v. Warren

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio

Date published: Mar 25, 2009

Citations

2009 Ohio 1296 (Ohio 2009)
121 Ohio St. 3d 1424

Citing Cases

Beckett v. Warren

{¶ 6} This court determined that a conflict exists and ordered the parties to brief the issue of "[w]hether a…