From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Beatty v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Bd. of Education

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Aug 1, 1991
329 N.C. 691 (N.C. 1991)

Opinion

No. 444PA90

Filed 14 August 1991

ON discretionary review pursuant to N.C.G.S. 7A-31 (a) of a decision of the Court of Appeals, 99 N.C. App. 753, 394 S.E.2d 242 (1990), affirming an order granting summary judgment to defendants Board of Education and Thomas Bridges, entered by Snepp, J., on 14 August 1989 in Superior Court, MECKLENBURG County. Heard in the Supreme Court 15 March 1991.

Karro, Sellers, Langson Gorelick, by C. Murphy Archibald and Seth H. Langson, for plaintiff appellant.

Weinstein Sturges, P.A., by Judith A. Starrett and Hugh B. Campbell, Jr., for defendant appellee.


Discretionary review improvidently allowed.


Summaries of

Beatty v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Bd. of Education

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Aug 1, 1991
329 N.C. 691 (N.C. 1991)
Case details for

Beatty v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Bd. of Education

Case Details

Full title:ANTHONY MAURICE BEATTY, BY AND THROUGH HIS GUARDIAN AD LITEM, NANCY BEATTY…

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina

Date published: Aug 1, 1991

Citations

329 N.C. 691 (N.C. 1991)
406 S.E.2d 579

Citing Cases

Martinez v. Wake Cnty. Bd. of Educ.

It is well settled that "[a] county or city board of education is a governmental agency, and therefore is not…