discussing that its sister circuits have divided over a "lenient" versus "strict" approach to the "cat’s paw" theory, before formulating an intermediate standard for itself
Summary of this case from Ossanna v. Nike, Inc.No. 06-341.
April 12, 2007.
Dismissal Under Rule 46
C.A. 10th Cir. [Certiorari granted, ante, p. 1105.] Writ of certiorari dismissed under this Court's Rule 46.2.
discussing that its sister circuits have divided over a "lenient" versus "strict" approach to the "cat’s paw" theory, before formulating an intermediate standard for itself
Summary of this case from Ossanna v. Nike, Inc.describing different approaches across circuits
Summary of this case from Ossanna v. Nike, Inc.Full title:BCI COCA-COLA BOTTLING COMPANY OF LOS ANGELES v. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT…
Court:U.S.
Date published: Apr 12, 2007
Of course, plaintiff did not lose his job based on that incident, which further undercuts any inference that…
Ossanna v. Nike, Inc.The federal courts, however, articulated the theory in almost as many ways as cats have lives; they often…