From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

BB Asset Management, Inc. v. Symantec Corp.

U.S.
Oct 5, 1992
506 U.S. 869 (1992)

Summary

holding that courts must balance the risk of inadvertent disclosure of trade secrets to competitors against the risk that the protection of such confidential information will impair prosecution of plaintiff's claims

Summary of this case from Markey v. Verimatrix, Inc.

Opinion

No. 92-178.

October 5, 1992.


C.A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 960 F.2d 1465.


Summaries of

BB Asset Management, Inc. v. Symantec Corp.

U.S.
Oct 5, 1992
506 U.S. 869 (1992)

holding that courts must balance the risk of inadvertent disclosure of trade secrets to competitors against the risk that the protection of such confidential information will impair prosecution of plaintiff's claims

Summary of this case from Markey v. Verimatrix, Inc.

interpreting probate code on presentation of claims, § 15-12-803, C.R.S. (1995 Cum. Supp.): "All claims . . . are barred against the estate" unless brought under the statutory conditions

Summary of this case from First Inter. Bk. v. Central Bank
Case details for

BB Asset Management, Inc. v. Symantec Corp.

Case Details

Full title:BB ASSET MANAGEMENT, INC., DBA BROWN BAG SOFTWARE v. SYMANTEC CORP. ET AL

Court:U.S.

Date published: Oct 5, 1992

Citations

506 U.S. 869 (1992)

Citing Cases

Yates v. Yates

In YellowBear v. State, 874 P.2d 241, 245 (Wyo. 1994) TA \1 " YellowBear v. State, 874 P.2d 241, 245 (Wyo.…

Woodall v. The Walt Disney Co.

Where there exists “good cause, ” Rule 26(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure authorizes the Court to…