From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bay Cities Paving Grading v. Lawyers' Mut. Ins. Co.

Court of Appeal of California
Jan 1, 1991
233 Cal.App.3d 1184 (Cal. Ct. App. 1991)

Summary

holding that failure to define term "related" as used in "limits of liability" clause of professional malpractice policy created ambiguity in policy that would be construed in favor of insured

Summary of this case from St. Paul Fire Marine Ins. Co. v. Chong

Opinion

1991.


REVIEW GRANTED

Reprinted without change in 4 Cal.App.4th 1762, to permit tracking pending review by the Supreme Court.


Summaries of

Bay Cities Paving Grading v. Lawyers' Mut. Ins. Co.

Court of Appeal of California
Jan 1, 1991
233 Cal.App.3d 1184 (Cal. Ct. App. 1991)

holding that failure to define term "related" as used in "limits of liability" clause of professional malpractice policy created ambiguity in policy that would be construed in favor of insured

Summary of this case from St. Paul Fire Marine Ins. Co. v. Chong
Case details for

Bay Cities Paving Grading v. Lawyers' Mut. Ins. Co.

Case Details

Full title:Bay Cities Paving Grading, Inc. v. Lawyers' Mutual Ins. Co

Court:Court of Appeal of California

Date published: Jan 1, 1991

Citations

233 Cal.App.3d 1184 (Cal. Ct. App. 1991)

Citing Cases

St. Paul Fire Marine Ins. Co. v. Chong

In particular, the use of the term "related," which itself has no accepted legal definition, allows the…