Baum v. Immel

Full title: JAMES JAY BAUM, Plaintiff, v. ANTHONY IMMEL, et al., Defendants

Court: United States District Court, W.D. Michigan, Northern Division

Date published: Mar 13, 2006

Case No. 2:05-cv-89 (W.D. Mich. Mar. 13, 2006)

Opinion

Case No. 2:05-cv-89.

March 13, 2006

OPINION AND ORDER APPROVING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

ROBERT BELL, Chief District Judge

The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation filed by the United States Magistrate Judge in this action on. The Report and Recommendation was duly served on the parties. The Court has received objections from the plaintiff. In accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the Court has performed de novo consideration of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which objection has been made. The Court now finds the objections to be without merit.

Plaintiff filed his civil rights action after the expiration of the statute of limitations period. Plaintiff has failed to set forth any valid reason to toll the statute of limitations period.

THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is approved and adopted as the opinion of the court.