Argued June 20, 1887
Decided October 11, 1887
Robert H. McClellan for appellant.
A.D. Wait for respondents.
Agree to affirm on opinions of General and Special Terms.
All concur except EARL, J., dissenting; RUGER, Ch. J., not sitting, and ANDREWS, J., not voting.
Judgment affirmed.
Full title:SARAH E. BAUCUS, Appellant, v . JAMES BARR et al., Respondents
Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Date published: Oct 11, 1887
The fiction of law that a debt of an administrator is to be considered as money on hand, is based…
State for Use of Frederick v. AllenIn New York, it seems, a judgment against an administrator is ordinarily conclusive on the surety. Deobold v.…