From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bates v. Offit Kurman Attorneys at Law LLP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Dec 23, 2019
19 CIVIL 2814 (KPF) (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 23, 2019)

Opinion

19 CIVIL 2814 (KPF)

12-23-2019

ROBERT BATES, ADAM RADLY, and ACL COMPUTERS AND SOFTWARE INC., Plaintiffs, v. OFFIT KURMAN ATTORNEYS AT LAW LLP, THEODORE P. STEIN, and LEGAL MALPRACTICE INSURANCE COMPANY JOHN DOE, Defendants.


JUDGMENT

It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Opinion and Order dated December 23, 2019, Defendants' motion to dismiss is GRANTED. Plaintiffs' Complaint is dismissed without prejudice; accordingly, the case is closed. Dated: New York, New York

December 23, 2019

RUBY J. KRAJICK

Clerk of Court

BY: /s/ _________

Deputy Clerk


Summaries of

Bates v. Offit Kurman Attorneys at Law LLP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Dec 23, 2019
19 CIVIL 2814 (KPF) (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 23, 2019)
Case details for

Bates v. Offit Kurman Attorneys at Law LLP

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT BATES, ADAM RADLY, and ACL COMPUTERS AND SOFTWARE INC., Plaintiffs…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: Dec 23, 2019

Citations

19 CIVIL 2814 (KPF) (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 23, 2019)

Citing Cases

Gold Coast Transp. Serv. v. NTI-NY, Inc.

) On the other hand, antagonism is absent “where the corporation does not, would not, or cannot express…