From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bateman v. National Union Fire Insurance Com. of Pitts

United States District Court, D. Montana, Missoula Division
Jan 15, 2009
CV 08-96-M-DWM (D. Mont. Jan. 15, 2009)

Opinion

CV 08-96-M-DWM.

January 15, 2009


ORDER


United States Magistrate Judge Jeremiah C. Lynch entered Findings and Recommendation in this matter on December 4, 2008. Judge Lynch recommended dismissing Plaintiffs' Amended Complaint pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b) for lack of jurisdiction. Plaintiffs did not object and so have waived the right to de novo review of the record. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). This Court will review the Findings and Recommendation for clear error.McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore Bus. Mach., Inc., 656 F.2d 1309, 1313 (9th Cir. 1981). Clear error exists if the Court is left with a "definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been committed." United States v. Syrax, 235 F.3d 422, 427 (9th Cir. 2000).

Plaintiffs' Amended Complaint asserts claims against National Union Fire Insurance ("National Union") and Federal Insurance Company under the Federal Declaratory Judgment Act, 28 U.S.C. §§ 2201, 2202. National Union moved to dismiss the complaint because, inter alia, it does not present an actual case or controversy. See Principal Life Ins. Co. V. Robinson, 394 F.3d 665, 669 (9th Cir. 2005). Judge Lynch found that Count 2 of the Amended Complaint, which is the only claim against National Union, does not present an actual case or controversy because it requests an advisory opinion stating that National Union must follow the applicable law. I find no clear error in Judge Lynch's findings and recommendations.

While Plaintiffs do not object to Judge Lynch's findings and recommendation, they request that the Court dismiss the complaint without prejudice. Plaintiffs assert that National Union has committed on-going violations of Montana's Unfair Trade Practices Act (UTPA). Judge Lynch's recommendation does not specify whether the claim should be dismissed without prejudice. If Plaintiffs allegations are true, it is possible they could assert a claim against National Union for violations of UTPA in the future. Dismissal without prejudice is appropriate. Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Judge Lynch's Findings and Recommendation (dkt #41) are adopted in full. Defendants' motion to dismiss (dkt #25) is GRANTED and Count 2 of Plaintiffs' amended complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.


Summaries of

Bateman v. National Union Fire Insurance Com. of Pitts

United States District Court, D. Montana, Missoula Division
Jan 15, 2009
CV 08-96-M-DWM (D. Mont. Jan. 15, 2009)
Case details for

Bateman v. National Union Fire Insurance Com. of Pitts

Case Details

Full title:LENORA DAVIS BATEMAN, VICKI EARHART, CAROL HEALD, IVAN KAYS, THERESA…

Court:United States District Court, D. Montana, Missoula Division

Date published: Jan 15, 2009

Citations

CV 08-96-M-DWM (D. Mont. Jan. 15, 2009)

Citing Cases

Yannuzzi v. U.S. Casualty Co.

"This court in accord with Illinois and many other states has held that an agent having authority to solicit…

Bruins v. Anderson

Waiver or estoppel, this court has repeatedly held, may preclude an insurer from raising objections as to the…