From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bateman v. Blumenthal

Supreme Court of California
Oct 30, 1882
61 Cal. 628 (Cal. 1882)

Opinion

         Department One

         Appeal from a judgment for the plaintiff, in the Fourth District Court in the City and County of San Francisco. Evans, J.

         COUNSEL

         The delay, if any, in bringing this cause to a hearing is not due to any fault of the appellant. ( C. C. P., § 957.)

          Alfred Rising, for Appellant.

          Michael Mullany, for Respondent.


         OPINION

         The Court:

         It is evidence from the record in this cause that the appeal was taken for delay, and that there is no merit in the appeal.

         Judgment affirmed with fifteen per cent. damages.


Summaries of

Bateman v. Blumenthal

Supreme Court of California
Oct 30, 1882
61 Cal. 628 (Cal. 1882)
Case details for

Bateman v. Blumenthal

Case Details

Full title:M. C. BATEMAN v. H. M. BLUMENTHAL

Court:Supreme Court of California

Date published: Oct 30, 1882

Citations

61 Cal. 628 (Cal. 1882)

Citing Cases

Gale v. Bradbury

The appeal is frivolous, and substantial damages should be awarded the respondent. (Gannon v. Dougherty , 41…