From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bastone v. Yonkers Racing Corp.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department
Dec 19, 1973
79 Misc. 2d 240 (N.Y. App. Term 1973)

Opinion

December 19, 1973

Appeal from the County Court of Westchester County, TIMOTHY J. SULLIVAN, J.

Bleakley, Platt, Schmidt Fritz ( Maurice F. Curran of counsel), for appellant.

Bernier Fidler ( Howard A. Bernier of counsel), for respondent.


MEMORANDUM.

Order unanimously reversed, with $10 costs to defendant, and complaint dismissed.

In this case, plaintiff alleged that he ordered certain "Superfecta" pari-mutuel tickets from the defendant, received what he believed to be those tickets but which in fact were not, and did not become aware of the error until after the race was over. The complaint alleged causes of action in contract and in negligence. The complaint herein fails to state a cause of action, since the key element is missing, to wit, the purchase and presentation of a winning ticket ( Holberg v. Westchester Racing Assn., 184 Misc. 581 [App. Term, 1st Dept.]; Carr v. State of New York, 30 Misc.2d 983, affd. 15 A.D.2d 709). Our present holding is not in conflict with our own case of Mills v. Roosevelt Raceway ( 66 Misc.2d 251, affd. 37 A.D.2d 1048), since in Mills, it was found by the jury that the plaintiff had indeed presented a winning ticket to the defendant and recovery was sustained because of defendant's mishandling of the winning ticket.

Concur — HOGAN, P.J., GLICKMAN and McCULLOUGH, JJ.


Summaries of

Bastone v. Yonkers Racing Corp.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department
Dec 19, 1973
79 Misc. 2d 240 (N.Y. App. Term 1973)
Case details for

Bastone v. Yonkers Racing Corp.

Case Details

Full title:ALPHONSO BASTONE, Respondent v. YONKERS RACING CORP., Appellant

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department

Date published: Dec 19, 1973

Citations

79 Misc. 2d 240 (N.Y. App. Term 1973)
360 N.Y.S.2d 149

Citing Cases

Hochhalter v. Dakota Race Management

As DRM argues, other "courts have uniformly and consistently held that a bettor's right to collect winnings…

Valois v. Gulfstream Park Racing

" This is also consistent with the New York approach that there can be no valid pari-mutuel wager without a…