From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bass v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Feb 23, 2005
894 So. 2d 303 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)

Opinion

No. 2D03-3928.

February 23, 2005.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Daniel L. Perry, Judge.

James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and Bruce P. Taylor, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Timothy A. Freeland, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.


Richard D. Bass argues, and the State concedes, that he was improperly sentenced as a habitual felony offender for his possession of cocaine convictions in case numbers 02-CF-12824 and 02-CF-02825. See Virgil v. State, 884 So.2d 373 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004) (holding that a defendant may not be sentenced as a habitual felony offender for the offense of possession of a controlled substance). We therefore reverse and remand his sentences for the trial court to delete the habitual felony offender designations from Bass's sentences for possession of cocaine. Bass's convictions and remaining sentences are otherwise affirmed.

We do not find merit in the other issue Bass raises on appeal.

NORTHCUTT and VILLANTI, JJ., Concur.


Summaries of

Bass v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Feb 23, 2005
894 So. 2d 303 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)
Case details for

Bass v. State

Case Details

Full title:Richard D. BASS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Feb 23, 2005

Citations

894 So. 2d 303 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)

Citing Cases

Vance v. State

Vance argues, and we agree, that the trial court erred in imposing a habitual felony offender sentence for…

Choctaw v. State

Choctaw correctly argues, and the State concedes, that the trial court erred in imposing a habitual felony…