applying New York law and Restatement (Second) of Contracts §§ 24, 26 (Tent.Draft No. 1, 1964)
Summary of this case from Lind v. Vanguard Offset Printers, Inc.No. 1046.
March 24, 1969.
C.A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied. Richard Joyce Smith, Forbes D. Shaw, John V. Thornton, and T. David Mullen for petitioners. Harold L. Warner, Jr., and Carl S. Rowe for respondents. Reported below: 404 F. 2d 495.
applying New York law and Restatement (Second) of Contracts §§ 24, 26 (Tent.Draft No. 1, 1964)
Summary of this case from Lind v. Vanguard Offset Printers, Inc.noting public interest in conditions affecting public health
Summary of this case from Rinsley v. BrandtFull title:BARWICK et al. v. V'SOSKE et al
Court:U.S.
Date published: Mar 24, 1969
The second stage is not necessary; it is merely considered desirable. As the Court of Appeals stated with…
Songbird Jet Ltd., Inc. v. Amax Inc.Schering Corp. v. Home Ins. Co., 712 F.2d 4, 9 (2d Cir. 1983).V'Soske v. Barwick, 404 F.2d 495, 499 (2d Cir.…