From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bartow v. Bartow

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 14, 1995
212 A.D.2d 564 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)

Opinion

February 14, 1995

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Doyle, J.).


Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, without costs or disbursements, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, to conduct a hearing on the issue of legal fees.

During the parties' divorce proceeding, the appellant moved (1) to be relieved as the defendant's counsel for health reasons, and (2) for a hearing to fix the fees for legal services rendered. The court granted the branch of the motion which was to relieve the appellant as the defendant's counsel and directed him to turn over the file to the defendant, but deferred a determination of the amount of counsel fees owed to the time of trial. The court also ordered the plaintiff's attorney to inform the appellant of any settlement or trial date. Neither the plaintiff's attorney nor the defendant informed the appellant when the matter was settled. After the divorce judgment was entered, the appellant learned of the settlement and moved for a hearing to fix his legal fees. The court denied the motion, noting that the application was made well after the divorce judgment had been entered.

The court erred in denying the motion. The appellant was entitled to a hearing, as previously ordered by the court. He made an application for the hearing at the earliest possible time, which, in this case, was after judgment was entered. Consequently, the court should have granted the motion. Balletta, J.P., Thompson, Santucci, Altman and Hart, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Bartow v. Bartow

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 14, 1995
212 A.D.2d 564 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
Case details for

Bartow v. Bartow

Case Details

Full title:EUGENE BARTOW, Plaintiff, v. CARYN BARTOW, Respondent, and ELLIOTT…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 14, 1995

Citations

212 A.D.2d 564 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
622 N.Y.S.2d 562

Citing Cases

Frankel v. Frankel

V. It is settled law that a timely fee application is key to the preservation of an outgoing attorney's…