From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bartlik v. U.S. Dep., L. Tennessee Valley Auth

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Dec 2, 1994
34 F.3d 368 (6th Cir. 1994)

Opinion

Nos. 93-3616, 93-3834.

December 2, 1994.

Before: MERRITT, Chief Judge; KEITH, KENNEDY, MARTIN, JONES, MILBURN, GUY, NELSON, RYAN, BOGGS, NORRIS, SUHRHEINRICH, SILER, BATCHELDER, and DAUGHTREY, Circuit Judges.


ORDER

A majority of the Judges of this Court in regular active service have voted for rehearing of this case en banc. Sixth Circuit Rule 14 provides as follows:

The effect of the granting of a hearing en banc shall be to vacate the previous opinion and judgment of this court, to stay the mandate and to restore the case on the docket sheet as a pending appeal.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the previous decision and judgment of this court is vacated, the mandate is stayed and this case is restored to the docket as a pending appeal.

The Clerk will direct the parties to file supplemental briefs and will schedule this case for oral argument as soon as possible.


Summaries of

Bartlik v. U.S. Dep., L. Tennessee Valley Auth

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Dec 2, 1994
34 F.3d 368 (6th Cir. 1994)
Case details for

Bartlik v. U.S. Dep., L. Tennessee Valley Auth

Case Details

Full title:ANDREW BARTLIK, PETITIONER, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit

Date published: Dec 2, 1994

Citations

34 F.3d 368 (6th Cir. 1994)

Citing Cases

Bartlik v. U.S. Dept. of Labor

814 F.2d at 326. Because we wanted to reconsider our understanding of the relationship between the federal…