From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bartlett v. Mansfield

Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough
Jan 7, 1913
85 A. 756 (N.H. 1913)

Opinion

Decided January 7, 1913.

David W. Perkins, for the plaintiff.

Wason Moran, for the defendant.


DEBT, against a selectman, to recover the penalty imposed by section 16, chapter 57, Public Statutes. Trial by jury and verdict for the defendant. Transferred from the January term, 1912, of the superior court by Mitchell, J. on exceptions taken by the plaintiff. On the ground that the private action for a penalty was abolished by chapter 31, Laws 1899, judgment was ordered for the defendant without considering the exceptions. State v. McConnell, 70 N.H. 158, 161; Noyes v. Edgerly, 71 N.H. 500, 503, 505.


Summaries of

Bartlett v. Mansfield

Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough
Jan 7, 1913
85 A. 756 (N.H. 1913)
Case details for

Bartlett v. Mansfield

Case Details

Full title:BARTLETT v. MANSFIELD

Court:Supreme Court of New Hampshire Hillsborough

Date published: Jan 7, 1913

Citations

85 A. 756 (N.H. 1913)
76 N.H. 582

Citing Cases

Smith Sargent v. Company

It must also be conceded that Moffie v. Slawsby, 77 N.H. 555, is an authority which supports the defendants'…

Moffie v. Slawsby

" Ashland Savings Bank v. Bailey, 66 N.H. 334, 335. This penalty is imposed for violation of the preceding…