From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Barta v. Target Corp.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SOUTHERN DIVISION - SANTA ANA
Sep 13, 2017
Case No. SACV 16-00786 AG (DFMx) (C.D. Cal. Sep. 13, 2017)

Summary

finding that a reasonable jury could not find that a wipe being on the floor for five and a half minutes is enough to give the defendant constructive notice of it

Summary of this case from Rodgers v. Stater Bros. Mkts.

Opinion

Case No. SACV 16-00786 AG (DFMx)

09-13-2017

Rosa Barta, Plaintiff, v. Target Corporation, et al., Defendants.


JUDGMENT

The Court enters judgment for Defendants and against Plaintiff. Dated September 13, 2017

/s/_________

Hon. Andrew J. Guilford

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Barta v. Target Corp.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SOUTHERN DIVISION - SANTA ANA
Sep 13, 2017
Case No. SACV 16-00786 AG (DFMx) (C.D. Cal. Sep. 13, 2017)

finding that a reasonable jury could not find that a wipe being on the floor for five and a half minutes is enough to give the defendant constructive notice of it

Summary of this case from Rodgers v. Stater Bros. Mkts.
Case details for

Barta v. Target Corp.

Case Details

Full title:Rosa Barta, Plaintiff, v. Target Corporation, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SOUTHERN DIVISION - SANTA ANA

Date published: Sep 13, 2017

Citations

Case No. SACV 16-00786 AG (DFMx) (C.D. Cal. Sep. 13, 2017)

Citing Cases

Rodgers v. Stater Bros. Mkts.

Based on these facts, the Court finds as a matter of law that Plaintiff's negligence and premises liability…