From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Barrick Goldstrike Mines, Inc. v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
May 14, 2020
462 P.3d 691 (Nev. 2020)

Opinion

No. 79652

05-14-2020

BARRICK GOLDSTRIKE MINES, INC., Petitioner, v. The EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT of the State of Nevada, IN AND FOR the COUNTY OF CLARK; and the Honorable Elizabeth Goff Gonzalez, District Judge, Respondents, and Bullion Monarch Mining, Inc., Real Party in Interest.

Parsons Behle & Latimer/Reno Parsons Behle & Latimer/Salt Lake City Lewis Roca Rothgerber Christie LLP/Las Vegas Robison, Sharp, Sullivan & Brust


Parsons Behle & Latimer/Reno

Parsons Behle & Latimer/Salt Lake City

Lewis Roca Rothgerber Christie LLP/Las Vegas

Robison, Sharp, Sullivan & Brust

ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS

This original petition for a writ of mandamus challenges a district court order denying a motion for summary judgment. Having considered the parties’ arguments and appendices filed in this matter, we are not persuaded that our extraordinary and discretionary intervention is warranted. See NRS 34.160 ; State ex rel. Dep’t of Transp. v. Thompson , 99 Nev. 358, 662 P.2d 1338 (1983) (observing that this court generally will not consider writ petitions challenging orders denying motions for summary judgment); Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist . Court , 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004) ("Petitioners carry the burden of demonstrating that extraordinary relief is warranted."). Accordingly, we

ORDER the petition DENIED.


Summaries of

Barrick Goldstrike Mines, Inc. v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
May 14, 2020
462 P.3d 691 (Nev. 2020)
Case details for

Barrick Goldstrike Mines, Inc. v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court

Case Details

Full title:BARRICK GOLDSTRIKE MINES, INC., Petitioner, v. THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL…

Court:SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

Date published: May 14, 2020

Citations

462 P.3d 691 (Nev. 2020)