From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Barretto v. Smith

United States District Court, E.D. California
Mar 6, 2009
No. CIV S-07-1544 FCD DAD P (E.D. Cal. Mar. 6, 2009)

Summary

holding failure to pursue timely grievance was not dispositive where prisoner had been hospitalized and in prison infirmary with pain and discomfort during the relevant period

Summary of this case from Peoples v. Corizon Health, Inc.

Opinion

No. CIV S-07-1544 FCD DAD P.

March 6, 2009


ORDER


Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262.

On November 20, 2008, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. Both parties have filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 72-304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed November 20, 2008 are adopted in full;

2. Defendants' August 8, 2008 motion to dismiss (Doc. No. 26) is granted in part and denied in part as follows:

a. Defendants' motion to dismiss plaintiff's complaint for failure to exhaust administrative remedies prior to filing suit as to the excessive use of force claims against defendants Smith and Look is denied;

b. Defendants' motion to dismiss plaintiff's complaint for failure to exhaust administrative remedies prior to filing suit as to the retaliation claims is granted as to defendants Schirmer and Wright but denied as to defendant Smith; and

c. Defendants' motion to dismiss plaintiff's complaint for failure to exhaust administrative remedies prior to filing suit as to the failure to protect claims against defendants Schirmer and Wright is granted.


Summaries of

Barretto v. Smith

United States District Court, E.D. California
Mar 6, 2009
No. CIV S-07-1544 FCD DAD P (E.D. Cal. Mar. 6, 2009)

holding failure to pursue timely grievance was not dispositive where prisoner had been hospitalized and in prison infirmary with pain and discomfort during the relevant period

Summary of this case from Peoples v. Corizon Health, Inc.
Case details for

Barretto v. Smith

Case Details

Full title:FRANCISCO BARRETTO, Plaintiff, v. L. SMITH, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Mar 6, 2009

Citations

No. CIV S-07-1544 FCD DAD P (E.D. Cal. Mar. 6, 2009)

Citing Cases

Ollison v. Vargo

Defendant "must accordingly demonstrate that its administrative remedies were 'available' to [Plaintiff],…

Washington v. Mohamed

However, it is improper for a court entertaining a 12(b) motion to make credibility determinations when, as…