From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Barrett v. State Mutual Life Assurance Company

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
May 31, 1978
378 N.E.2d 1047 (N.Y. 1978)

Opinion

Argued April 25, 1978

Decided May 31, 1978

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the First Judicial Department, IRVING SMITH, J.

Samuel Sherman and Leon Wasserman for appellant.

William E. Kelly and C. Robert Prianti for respondent.


MEMORANDUM.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs. We agree that the Appellate Division was not bound by its earlier determination, as the law of the case, because of the additional and persuasive evidence on the second trial. On the merits we find that the defendant was entitled to a directed verdict for the reasons stated in the Per Curiam opinion at the Appellate Division ( 58 A.D.2d 320; see, also, Process Plants Corp. v Beneficial Nat. Life Ins. Co., 42 N.Y.2d 928, affg 53 A.D.2d 214).

Chief Judge BREITEL and Judges JASEN, GABRIELLI, JONES, WACHTLER, FUCHSBERG and COOKE concur.

Order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.


Summaries of

Barrett v. State Mutual Life Assurance Company

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
May 31, 1978
378 N.E.2d 1047 (N.Y. 1978)
Case details for

Barrett v. State Mutual Life Assurance Company

Case Details

Full title:BARBARA BARRETT, Appellant, v. STATE MUTUAL LIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: May 31, 1978

Citations

378 N.E.2d 1047 (N.Y. 1978)
378 N.E.2d 1047
407 N.Y.S.2d 478

Citing Cases

L. Smirlock Realty Corp. v. Title Guarantee Co.

As an aid to determining whether the individual insurer would have refused to issue the policy in question…

Simon v. Govt. Employees Life Ins. Co. of N.Y

(See Insurance Law, § 149, subd 4; see, also, Leamy v. Berkshire Life Ins. Co., 39 N.Y.2d 271; Tolar v.…