From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Barrett v. Korbel

Supreme Court of Minnesota
Aug 2, 1974
221 N.W.2d 125 (Minn. 1974)

Summary

dismissing appeal where non-attorney appellant failed to file brief that complied with rule 128 or provide adequate record

Summary of this case from Manor v. Irvin O Buschkowsky Revocable TR

Opinion

No. 44571.

August 2, 1974.

Appeal and error — failure to furnish transcript and brief — dismissal.

In a proceeding in Hennepin County District Court, A. Paul Lommen, Judge, Emil Korbel was adjudicated the father of a child born to one Joyce Barrett, and he appealed from an order denying his motion for a new trial. Appeal dismissed.

Emil Korbel, pro se, for appellant.

Warren Spannaus, Attorney General, Gary W. Flakne, County Attorney, and Theodore R. Rix, Vernon E. Bergstrom, and Michael McGlennen, Assistant County Attorneys, for respondent.

Considered and decided by the court without oral argument.


This is a pro se appeal by a defendant in a paternity proceeding under Minn. St. 1969, § 257.19. Defendant, who was found by a jury to be the father of complainant's child, contends, among other things, that he was denied his right to a speedy trial, that the prosecutor acted improperly, that the complainant's testimony lacked credibility, and that the verdict was unsupported by the evidence. However, defendant has failed to comply with the Rules of Civil Appellate Procedure, specifically Rule 110.02 (with respect to a transcript of the proceedings) and Rule 128 (dealing with the contents of an appellate brief). Since defendant is a nonlawyer acting as attorney pro se, we might be inclined to disregard defendant's failure to file a proper brief, but as we indicated in Noltimier v. Noltimier, 280 Minn. 28, 157 N.W.2d 530 (1968), we cannot as easily disregard an appellant's failure to provide an adequate record because without an adequate record there is no way we can review a case. Moreover, defendant was found to be the father after a jury trial. Upon careful consideration, we have decided that defendant's appeal should be dismissed.

Appeal dismissed.

MR. JUSTICE SCOTT took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.


Summaries of

Barrett v. Korbel

Supreme Court of Minnesota
Aug 2, 1974
221 N.W.2d 125 (Minn. 1974)

dismissing appeal where non-attorney appellant failed to file brief that complied with rule 128 or provide adequate record

Summary of this case from Manor v. Irvin O Buschkowsky Revocable TR
Case details for

Barrett v. Korbel

Case Details

Full title:STATE, ON BEHALF OF JOYCE BARRETT, v. EMIL KORBEL

Court:Supreme Court of Minnesota

Date published: Aug 2, 1974

Citations

221 N.W.2d 125 (Minn. 1974)
221 N.W.2d 125

Citing Cases

Thomale v. State

We affirm. Petitioner, who is incarcerated at the State Prison for a 3 to 5-year term, has failed to comply…

Manor v. Irvin O Buschkowsky Revocable TR

" Thomale v. State, 261 N.W.2d 353, 353 (Minn. 1977); but see State on Behalf of Barrett v. Korbel, 300 Minn.…