From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

BARR v. DIGUGLIELMO

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
May 30, 2008
CIVIL ACTION NO. 08-316 (E.D. Pa. May. 30, 2008)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 08-316.

May 30, 2008


ORDER


AND NOW, this 30th day of May, 2008, upon careful and independent consideration of the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, the response thereto, a review of the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Lynne A. Sitarski, dated May 7, 2008, and Petitioner's Objections thereto, it is hereby ORDERED that:

1. Petitioner's Objections to the Report and Recommendation are DENIED.

2. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED.

3. The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DENIED WITH PREJUDICE.

4. There is no probable cause to issue a certificate of appealability.

5. The Clerk of Court shall mark this case closed for statistical purposes.


Summaries of

BARR v. DIGUGLIELMO

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
May 30, 2008
CIVIL ACTION NO. 08-316 (E.D. Pa. May. 30, 2008)
Case details for

BARR v. DIGUGLIELMO

Case Details

Full title:JAMAL Y. BARR v. DAVID DIGUGLIELMO, et al

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: May 30, 2008

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 08-316 (E.D. Pa. May. 30, 2008)

Citing Cases

Nichols v. Coleman

" 42 Pa. Cons. Stat. Ann. § 9545(b) (emphasis added); see also Commonwealth v. Greer, 866 A.2d 433, 436 (Pa.…