From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Baron v. Stewart Michael Design, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 7, 1994
202 A.D.2d 383 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)

Opinion

March 7, 1994

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Roncallo, J.).


Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is granted, and the parties are directed to proceed to arbitration.

The parties entered into a contract which contained an arbitration clause. After the defendant gave notice of its intent to terminate the contract and seek arbitration, the plaintiffs commenced this action, seeking damages for breach of contract, fraud, conversion, and negligence. The record, which the parties stipulate is complete, is bare of pleadings or motion papers demonstrating that the plaintiffs sought rescission. Under these circumstances, the Supreme Court should have directed the parties to proceed to arbitration (see, Matter of Bichler v. 100 Lexington Ave. Corp., 4 A.D.2d 949). Mangano, P.J., Balletta, O'Brien, Hart and Florio, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Baron v. Stewart Michael Design, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 7, 1994
202 A.D.2d 383 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
Case details for

Baron v. Stewart Michael Design, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:STEPHEN BARON et al., Respondents, v. STEWART MICHAEL DESIGN, INC.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 7, 1994

Citations

202 A.D.2d 383 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
608 N.Y.S.2d 516

Citing Cases

Dazco Heating A.C. Corp. v. C.B.C. Indus

Since this action is based on the defendants' alleged refusal to allow the plaintiff to perform under the…