From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Barnhill v. Barnhill

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama
Nov 4, 1987
516 So. 2d 725 (Ala. Civ. App. 1987)

Opinion

Civ. 5828.

November 4, 1987.

Appeal from the Autauga County Circuit Court, John Bush, J.

J. Myron Smith, Prattville, for appellant.

Clifford W. Cleveland and Louis C. Colley, Prattville, for appellee.


This is a child custody modification case.

The father sought to modify a prior decree of divorce awarding custody to the mother. After an ore tenus hearing, the trial court refused to modify the custody decree.

The father appeals and we affirm.

Rule 28, Alabama Rules of Appellate Procedure, in pertinent part provides as follows:

"(a) Brief of the Appellant. The brief of the appellant shall contain under appropriate headings and in the order here indicated:

". . .

"(5) An argument (The argument may be preceded by a summary. The argument shall contain the contentions of the appellant with respect to the issues presented, and the reasons therefor, with citations to the authorities, statutes and parts of the record relied on)."

The father in his original brief to this court has failed to substantially comply with the above rule. In fact, he does not cite to this court any citations of authority to support his contentions of error committed by the trial court.

In view of the above, this court has no alternative but to affirm. See Melton v. Jackson, 284 Ala. 253, 224 So.2d 611 (1969); 2A Ala. Digest, Appeal Error, Key No. 758.1 (1982).

This case is due to be affirmed.

AFFIRMED.

BRADLEY, P.J., and INGRAM, J., concur.


Summaries of

Barnhill v. Barnhill

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama
Nov 4, 1987
516 So. 2d 725 (Ala. Civ. App. 1987)
Case details for

Barnhill v. Barnhill

Case Details

Full title:Owen Kenneth BARNHILL v. Brenda Matthews BARNHILL (Reed)

Court:Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Date published: Nov 4, 1987

Citations

516 So. 2d 725 (Ala. Civ. App. 1987)

Citing Cases

Crawford v. Bullock

The father contends that he should not have been held responsible for this debt. However, this issue was not…

Whaley v. State Dept. of Revenue

" (Emphasis supplied.) By failing to properly cite any authority to support his contention, the taxpayer has…