From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Barker v. Lappas

Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Mar 3, 1967
412 S.W.2d 263 (Ky. Ct. App. 1967)

Opinion

March 3, 1967.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Green County, C.R. Walden, Special Judge.

Paul R. Huddleston, Bowling Green, for appellants.

Davis Williams, Munfordville, Morris Butler, Greensburg, for cross-appellants.

Woolsey M. Caye, Tilford Dobbins, Louisville, Davis Williams, Munfordville, Morris Butler, Greensburg, for appellees.

Paul R. Huddleston, Bowling Green, Woolsey M. Caye, Louisville, for cross-appellees.


This action stems from the decision rendered by this Court involving the same parties in Lappas et al. v. Barker et al., Ky., 375 S.W.2d 248 (1963).

After the trial court entered a judgment as directed by this Court, appellants — William L. Barker, Milton R. Barker, and Everett Pope — filed a motion in that court for leave to file an amended complaint. Over objection leave was granted and an amended complaint was filed. The trial court then subsequently dismissed the amended complaint. Appeal was taken to this Court, and appellees — Delmous Craighead and James E. Smith — filed a cross-appeal on the grounds that the trial court erred in permitting the amended complaint to be filed.

Since no briefs were filed for appellants their appeal is dismissed. RCA 1.260(b).

Since the issue presented by the cross-appeal is now moot, that appeal is also dismissed.

All concur.


Summaries of

Barker v. Lappas

Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Mar 3, 1967
412 S.W.2d 263 (Ky. Ct. App. 1967)
Case details for

Barker v. Lappas

Case Details

Full title:William L. BARKER et al., Appellants, v. Theodore LAPPAS et al., Appellees

Court:Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Date published: Mar 3, 1967

Citations

412 S.W.2d 263 (Ky. Ct. App. 1967)

Citing Cases

Milby v. Mears

I The first issue concerns Milby's failure to address the issue of contributory negligence in his original…

City of St. Matthews v. McGalin

RCA 1.260(b) provides: "If the appellant fails to file his brief within the time allowed, the appeal may be…