From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Barelko v. Powder Power Tool Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Sep 21, 1961
14 A.D.2d 670 (N.Y. App. Div. 1961)

Opinion

September 21, 1961


Order, entered on January 10, 1961, unanimously reversed, on the law, on the facts and in the exercise of discretion, with $20 costs and disbursements to appellant, and the motion for leave to serve an amended answer to allege the affirmative defense of res judicata denied, with $10 costs. The delay in making the application until more than two years after the facts arose upon which the proposed defense is based, and the indicated prejudice to plaintiff-appellant constitute laches. (4 Carmody-Wait, New York Practice, § 28, p. 572.)

Concur — Botein, P.J., Breitel, Rabin, Eager and Noonan, JJ.


Summaries of

Barelko v. Powder Power Tool Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Sep 21, 1961
14 A.D.2d 670 (N.Y. App. Div. 1961)
Case details for

Barelko v. Powder Power Tool Corp.

Case Details

Full title:IRVING BARELKO, Appellant, v. POWDER POWER TOOL CORP. et al., Defendants…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Sep 21, 1961

Citations

14 A.D.2d 670 (N.Y. App. Div. 1961)

Citing Cases

Wyman v. Morone

e Cent. Schools, 29 A.D.2d 812, supra; Mermelstein v. Lee, 23 A.D.2d 689; Bentivegna v. Boscha, 18 A.D.2d…

Ames v. Knobler

Where prejudice appears, belated motions to amend pleadings should be denied. ( Massi v. Alben Builders, 270…