From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Barclay v. Superior Court

Court of Appeal of California, Second District, Division One
Mar 25, 1930
104 Cal.App. 789 (Cal. Ct. App. 1930)

Opinion

Docket No. 7136.

March 25, 1930.

PROCEEDING in Mandamus to compel the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Elliot Craig, Judge, to grant a motion to perfect an appeal in forma pauperis. Writ denied.

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

James T. Barclay, in pro. per., for Petitioner.

No appearance for Respondent.


THE COURT.

[1] On the authority of the decision of this court in Rucker v. Superior Court, ante, p. 683 [ 286 P. 732], in which the opinion was this day filed, the petition for writ of mandate is this day denied.

A petition for a rehearing of this cause was denied by the District Court of Appeal on April 22, 1930, and an application by petitioners to have the cause heard in the Supreme Court, after judgment in the District Court of Appeal, was denied by the Supreme Court on May 22, 1930.


Summaries of

Barclay v. Superior Court

Court of Appeal of California, Second District, Division One
Mar 25, 1930
104 Cal.App. 789 (Cal. Ct. App. 1930)
Case details for

Barclay v. Superior Court

Case Details

Full title:JAMES T. BARCLAY, Petitioner, v. SUPERIOR COURT OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY…

Court:Court of Appeal of California, Second District, Division One

Date published: Mar 25, 1930

Citations

104 Cal.App. 789 (Cal. Ct. App. 1930)
294 P. 1122

Citing Cases

Mehdi v. Superior Court

In affirming denial of mandate, the appellate court stated: "This federal statutory rule has no counterpart…

Legg v. Superior Court

This federal statutory rule has no counterpart in our own statutes (see Gov. Code, §§ 69953, 70051; Rules on…