From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Barcellos v. Triboro Coach Corp.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jan 25, 1962
180 N.E.2d 919 (N.Y. 1962)

Opinion

Argued January 15, 1962

Decided January 25, 1962

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department, NICHOLAS M. PETTE, J.

Burton S. Cooper, Bernard Shatzkin and Sheldon Rudoff for appellant.

John F. Mulholland and Walter F. Doyle for respondents.



Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Chief Judge DESMOND and Judges DYE, FULD, FROESSEL, BURKE and FOSTER. Judge VAN VOORHIS dissents and votes to reverse and to dismiss the complaint upon the ground that no actionable negligence was proved against appellant.


Summaries of

Barcellos v. Triboro Coach Corp.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jan 25, 1962
180 N.E.2d 919 (N.Y. 1962)
Case details for

Barcellos v. Triboro Coach Corp.

Case Details

Full title:MARY BARCELLOS et al., Respondents, v. TRIBORO COACH CORP., Appellant, et…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Jan 25, 1962

Citations

180 N.E.2d 919 (N.Y. 1962)
180 N.E.2d 919
225 N.Y.S.2d 768

Citing Cases

Dwyer v. City of New York

The duty extends to a city street if it be the place of discharge and is independent of and not coextensive…

Blye v. Manhattan & Bronx Surface Transit Operating Authority

Similarly, in Young v Jamaica Buses ( 262 App. Div. 860), where the trial court had dismissed the complaint…