From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Barberton v. Jenney, 2009-1069

Supreme Court of Ohio
Jun 2, 2010
2010 Ohio 2425 (Ohio 2010)

Summary

holding that an officer's unaided visual estimate of a vehicle's speed is legally sufficient to convict a person of speeding if there is evidence the officer has the appropriate training, certification, and experience

Summary of this case from City of Beachwood v. Joyner

Opinion

No. 2009-1069.

June 2, 2010.

Summit App. No. 24423, 2009-Ohio-1985. Judgment of the court of appeals affirmed.


MERIT DECISIONS WITH OPINIONS


Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O'Connor, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., concur.

O'Donnell, J., dissents.

Brown, C.J., not participating.


Summaries of

Barberton v. Jenney, 2009-1069

Supreme Court of Ohio
Jun 2, 2010
2010 Ohio 2425 (Ohio 2010)

holding that an officer's unaided visual estimate of a vehicle's speed is legally sufficient to convict a person of speeding if there is evidence the officer has the appropriate training, certification, and experience

Summary of this case from City of Beachwood v. Joyner
Case details for

Barberton v. Jenney, 2009-1069

Case Details

Full title:Barberton v. Jenney, Slip Opinion No. 2010-Ohio-2420

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio

Date published: Jun 2, 2010

Citations

2010 Ohio 2425 (Ohio 2010)
929 N.E.2d 1047

Citing Cases

State v. Woods

{¶ 16} Some appellate courts in Ohio, including ours, have held that an officer's visual estimation of a…

State v. Mundy

This division was added in 2011 in response to the Ohio Supreme Court's holding the year before that "[a]…