From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Barberousse v. Barberousse

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit
Feb 7, 1990
556 So. 2d 930 (La. Ct. App. 1990)

Summary

In Barber, the parties had an interim 50–50 arrangement, which the trial court refused to continue; instead, the trial court awarded the father reasonable visitation rights.

Summary of this case from Hanks v. Hanks

Opinion

No. 88-1098.

February 7, 1990.

APPEAL FROM TENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF NATCHITOCHES, STATE OF LOUISIANA, HONORABLE JOHN B. WHITAKER, J.

McClain Morgan, R. Scott McClain, Lake Charles, for plaintiff-appellant.

Gahagan Gahagan, Fred S. Gahagan, Natchitoches, for defendant-appellee.

Before DOMENGEAUX, C.J., and FORET and LABORDE, JJ.


Terri Vercher Barberousse appeals the trial court's judgment granting to her former husband, Douglas Eugene Barberousse, visitation privileges during all three major holidays.

Terri and Douglas were divorced on June 20, 1986, by decree of the Thirty-First Judicial District Court, Parish of Jefferson Davis. The divorce judgment provides for joint custody of the two minor children born of the marriage and names Mrs. Barberousse as the custodial parent. However, the divorce judgment makes no provision for visitation privileges other than to say that the father shall be allowed visitation privileges "at reasonable times and places." On February 12, 1988, Mrs. Barberousse filed a rule seeking an increase in child support payments and further requesting that the court establish a set visitation schedule. After hearing the evidence, the trial court granted visitation privileges to Mr. Barberousse for one weekend per month, as well as six weeks during summer vacation. He also granted to Mr. Barberousse visitation privileges from 6:00 P.M. on the last school day preceding the Thanksgiving and Easter holidays until 6:00 P.M. of the last day of school vacation during said holidays. With regard to Christmas, the trial court granted to Mr. Barberousse visitation privileges beginning 8:00 P.M. on Christmas Eve and ending at 6:00 P.M. on the last day of Christmas vacation.

In her appeal, Mrs. Barberousse contends that the trial court abused its much discretion in awarding to Mr. Barberousse visitation privileges for all three major holidays. With this contention, we agree.

The paramount consideration in setting visitation privileges for the non-custodial parent is the best interest or welfare of the child or children. Finch v. Finch, 479 So.2d 473 (La.App. 1 Cir. 1985); Duplantis v. Monteaux, 412 So.2d 215 (La.App. 3 Cir. 1982). In Colley v. Colley, 435 So.2d 1141 (La.App. 1 Cir. 1983), writ denied, 441 So.2d 751 (La. 1983), the court reversed the trial court's judgment granting to the non-custodial parent, among other things, visitation privileges for Christmas, Easter, and Thanksgiving of each year. In so doing, the court noted that it was important to the child's future development that she spend some major holidays with each parent every year. While each case must surely be judged on its own facts, we find this to be true in the instant case. Accordingly, we hold that the trial court abused its much discretion in granting to Mr. Barberousse visitation privileges for all three major holidays.

In view of the above, the trial court's judgment awarding to Mr. Barberousse yearly visitation privileges for Christmas, Easter, and Thanksgiving is hereby reversed. The judgment of the trial court is recast, in pertinent part, as follows:

IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that during the even numbered years, beginning in 1990, DOUGLAS EUGENE BARBEROUSSE shall have the physical custody of the minor children, Casey Marie Barberousse and Amy Lynn Barberousse, beginning at 6:00 P.M. on the last school day preceding the Easter and Thanksgiving school holidays, and ending at 6:00 P.M. on the last day of the Easter or Thanksgiving school holidays, whichever the case may be. During the odd numbered years, beginning in 1991, DOUGLAS EUGENE BARBEROUSSE is granted visitation privileges beginning at 8:00 P.M. on Christmas Eve and ending at 6:00 P.M. on the last day of the Christmas school vacation.

All costs of this appeal and in the trial court are to be paid by defendant-appellee, DOUGLAS EUGENE BARBEROUSSE.

REVERSED AND RENDERED.


Summaries of

Barberousse v. Barberousse

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit
Feb 7, 1990
556 So. 2d 930 (La. Ct. App. 1990)

In Barber, the parties had an interim 50–50 arrangement, which the trial court refused to continue; instead, the trial court awarded the father reasonable visitation rights.

Summary of this case from Hanks v. Hanks
Case details for

Barberousse v. Barberousse

Case Details

Full title:TERRI VERCHER BARBEROUSSE, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. DOUGLAS EUGENE…

Court:Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit

Date published: Feb 7, 1990

Citations

556 So. 2d 930 (La. Ct. App. 1990)

Citing Cases

Wilson v. Wilson

Each child custody case must be viewed in light of its own particular set of facts and circumstances, with…

Porter v. Porter

Each child custody case must be reviewed in light of its own particular set of facts and circumstances with…