soliciting and suborning perjured testimony does not create liability in damages for prosecutorial conduct functionally qualifying for absolute immunity under Imbler
Summary of this case from Cooney v. Park CountyNo. 87-2034.
March 6, 1989.
C.A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 836 F. 2d 96.
soliciting and suborning perjured testimony does not create liability in damages for prosecutorial conduct functionally qualifying for absolute immunity under Imbler
Summary of this case from Cooney v. Park CountyFull title:BARBERA, ADMINISTRATRIX OF THE GOODS, CHATTELS, AND CREDITS OF BARBERA v…
Court:U.S.
Date published: Mar 6, 1989
In order "[t]o establish a Bivens claim, the plaintiff must allege that the individual defendants were…
Smith v. GribetzHowever, the line between a prosecutor's acts in preparing for a prosecution, which are immune, and his or…