From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Banks v. Zickefoose

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Jan 30, 2014
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:13-CV-3042 (M.D. Pa. Jan. 30, 2014)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:13-CV-3042

01-30-2014

FREDERICK BANKS, Plaintiff v. ZICKEFOOSE, et al., Defendants.


(Chief Judge Conner)


ORDER

AND NOW, this 30th day of January, 2014, upon consideration of the pro se plaintiff's motion (Doc. 6) for reconsideration, and it appearing that plaintiff fails to demonstrate reliance on one of three major grounds needed for a proper motion for reconsideration, North River Ins. Co. v. Cigna Reinsurance Co., 52 F.3d 1194, 1218 (3d Cir. 1995) (stating three major grounds include "(1) an intervening change in controlling law; (2) the availability of new evidence [not available previously]; [or], (3) the need to correct clear error [of law] or prevent manifest injustice." ), but, instead, simply disagrees with the court's decision, see Waye v. First Citizen's Nat'l Bank, 846 F. Supp. 310, 314 (M.D. Pa. Feb. 4, 1994) (finding that "[a] motion for reconsideration is not to be used to reargue matters already argued and disposed of."), aff'd, 31 F.3d 1174 (3d Cir. 1994); also Database America, Inc. v. Bellsouth Adver. & Publ'g Corp., 825 F. Supp. 1216, 1220 (D.N.J. June 15, 1993) (citations omitted) (holding "[a] party seeking reconsideration must show more than a disagreement with the Court's decision, and 'recapitulation of the cases and arguments considered by the court before rendering its original decision fails to carry the moving party's burden.'"), it is hereby ORDERED that plaintiff's motion (Doc. 6) is summarily DENIED.

_______________

Christopher C. Conner, Chief Judge

United States District Court

Middle District of Pennsylvania


Summaries of

Banks v. Zickefoose

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Jan 30, 2014
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:13-CV-3042 (M.D. Pa. Jan. 30, 2014)
Case details for

Banks v. Zickefoose

Case Details

Full title:FREDERICK BANKS, Plaintiff v. ZICKEFOOSE, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Jan 30, 2014

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:13-CV-3042 (M.D. Pa. Jan. 30, 2014)