From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Banks v. Warren Manor Nursing Home

United States District Court, M.D. Alabama, Northern Division
Jan 24, 2011
CASE NO. 2:10-cv-595-MEF WO (M.D. Ala. Jan. 24, 2011)

Opinion

CASE NO. 2:10-cv-595-MEF WO.

January 24, 2011


ORDER


After an independent review of the file, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT and DECREE of the court that:

1. The plaintiff's objections (Doc. #22 #23) to the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge filed on January 13, 2010 are overruled;

2. The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. #21) filed on December 27, 2010 is adopted;

3. Pursuant to 9 U.S.C. § 4, defendants' motion to dismiss is GRANTED and plaintiff's claims are DISMISSED with prejudice, and that plaintiff is directed to pursue her claims, if at all, through binding arbitration as set forth in Warren Manor's Employment Dispute Resolution Program.

DONE this the 24th day of January, 2011.


Summaries of

Banks v. Warren Manor Nursing Home

United States District Court, M.D. Alabama, Northern Division
Jan 24, 2011
CASE NO. 2:10-cv-595-MEF WO (M.D. Ala. Jan. 24, 2011)
Case details for

Banks v. Warren Manor Nursing Home

Case Details

Full title:VIOLA H. BANKS, Plaintiff, v. WARREN MANOR NURSING HOME, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, M.D. Alabama, Northern Division

Date published: Jan 24, 2011

Citations

CASE NO. 2:10-cv-595-MEF WO (M.D. Ala. Jan. 24, 2011)

Citing Cases

Envision HealthCare Corp. v. United HealthCare Ins. Co.

When a case is subject to binding arbitration, it is within the district court's discretion whether to stay…